For private equity firms
Your deal files, IC memos, minutes and board decks already contain the answer to most of what a partner asks on a Monday. They just do not contain it in one place, and nobody is paid to reassemble them. Nemosyne reads them once, writes down what it learned, and keeps the result cited.
Nothing moves and nothing is migrated. Nemosyne connects to the systems the fund already runs and reads them where they sit.
Permissions arrive with the documents. A deal folder only the deal team can open stays that way inside the memory, and an answer assembled for anyone else simply does not contain it.
The same three shapes come round every quarter. What changes is not that the work disappears — it is that nobody has to reassemble the record before it can start.
someone rebuilds the story: last quarter's pack, the covenant position, what the board said, what the committee made conditional, and whether that condition was ever released.
the current position is already assembled, each figure naming the document it came from, and a condition nothing on the record has discharged still reads as conditional rather than assumed closed.
“have we seen this before?” is answered by whoever happens to remember, and the people who left took their recall with them.
the earlier deals that resemble this one come back with what was decided, the stated rationale and what happened next — including the ones the firm declined.
the decision history is reconstructed from a folder, and the reasoning behind a three-year-old approval is usually gone.
every resolution, its basis and the documents behind it are still attached, so the narrative you take to a buyer is the one the record actually supports.
Illustrative — the firms, names and figures below are invented
Meridian Health is a portfolio company. In March the investment committee approved a follow-on investment, subject to confirmatory diligence. In June the quarterly review comes round and the partner asks what the position is.
The condition has no discharge. No document after March records the confirmatory diligence being completed, and the minutes record no vote — silence is not unanimity. The answer says so rather than reporting the deal as approved, because the record does not say that.
Through the same Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor your firm already uses — one connection per firm, and each person sees only what they are allowed to see.
Prepare the quarterly review for Meridian Health.
Approved in March subject to confirmatory diligence; no later document records the condition being discharged.
Two comparable deals were declined on this concentration profile — Harbor in 2023 and Kestrel in 2022.
Each sentence carries the document it came from, so the partner opens the minutes rather than taking a summary on trust.
Day to day, is this more about running the fund, running deals, or both?
Firms that run funds and firms that run deals want different things from the same documents. A fund operation cares about LP reporting, capital calls and the side letters that constrain them; a deal team cares about precedent, rationale and what a committee actually resolved. We would rather know which you lean to — or that it is genuinely both — than average the two.
Free for three people and about a hundred documents. No card, no expiry.
Start free →Also written up for Private credit · Legal · Tax · Accountancy · Audit