Nemosyne
Menu

Your discipline

See how it applies to your organisation.

Pick your discipline. The firms and figures below are invented; the documents and questions are the ones Nemosyne ships for it.

The private equity pack ships with six entity types, twenty-five document types, and a view of which to trust first.

What changes for you

Go into every IC and portfolio review with the relevant history already assembled.

Decision preparation

IC memo

The committee approved a third roll-up thesis. The first two ran into the same integration problem.

Outcome learning / calibration

Deal post-mortem

Five years of decisions on file. Nobody can say whether the team’s forecasts run high or low.

Population screening

Portfolio triage

200 names in the book. The review covered the 40 that someone remembered to open.

See every kind of work

Illustrative example · Private equity

The committee approved a third roll-up thesis. The first two ran into the same integration problem.

How it works today

The recommendation is written from the current file, over days of work. The firm’s earlier papers on similar cases, and what happened after them, are rarely reopened.

With shared memory

The memo starts from the firm’s own prior decisions on comparable cases, their stated rationale, and what the record shows arrived after each, so a thesis that ran into trouble before is in front of the committee.

How you would know it worked

Memo hours, and the number of relevant precedents surfaced that the team had not recalled.

In deal shops an investment committee memo takes 13 to 40 hours.

In your assistant

An answer that shows its basis.

Illustrative example · Private equity

Prepare the quarterly review for Meridian Health.

Evidence available as of 30 June

  • Approved subject to confirmatory diligenceBoard minutes · 11 March
  • Primary rationale: roll-up in a fragmented marketIC memo · 4 March
  • Q1 revenue 8% below budgetBoard deck · Q1
  • Integration capacity raised in three documentsNoticed across several documents
Evidence gap: the condition has no discharge

The approval was conditional and no later document records the confirmatory diligence being completed. The minutes also record no vote, and silence is not unanimity.

Suggested next stepAsk the committee secretary whether the condition was discharged, and on what record.

When new evidence arrives

14 JULY · New source: July board minutes

Condition released

The committee records the diligence complete and releases the condition.

The March resolution and the basis of the June review remain visible. A later release does not make the June answer wrong.

Start with one decision worth improving

The first thing we would ask you.

Pick one decision to start with: a quarterly portfolio review, an IC pack, or a screening decision.

Day to day, is this more about running the fund, running deals, or both?

Firms that run funds and firms that run deals want different things from the same documents.

Your own version is built from your documents: create your organisation, drop a folder, and the first companies and people appear within a minute.